All
of those overused phrases come to mind again, those metaphors that aren’t
metaphors—earth as our source, earth as Mother, being one with the land….
Interesting
how the land wanted to make parts of herself mobile. All of us creepy-crawly parts of the land
increase the ways that the earth can dance with herself, experience
manifestation. We can interact with the
rooted things, the stationary things, and the other creepy-crawlies.
But we are ultimately just cells of the land, not independent at all. I can’t quite find the right metaphor, actually. Are we cells of the land, neurons of the land, holograms of the land, blossoms of the land?
I
intuit that to be fully human we can’t be cut off from the land. I understand that knowledge and wisdom reside
in the land, come from the land. Where
else could knowledge reside? Without the
land, if I were a disembodied spirit, floating in the ether, there would be
literally nothing to know.
This
gets back to Jung’s “Answer to Job”. Before God created a physical world he could
not know himself. Only by physically
manifesting could there be reference points and knowledge. Everything physical is God referencing
different parts and aspects of himself.
More
and more I’m beginning to think we have to conceptualize the earth as our
mind. And beyond that we have to
conceptualize her as our body too. We
can’t think or know or act without her.
And we’re not just travelers on spaceship earth—like astronauts. The earth isn’t some hulking lifeless
contraption we’re using. Earth is a
pulsing, living, conscious entity of which we are an organ (cell, neuron,
blossom,…).
To
be fully human we have to tap into our larger mind—the Earth. It makes the Edith Cobb thesis all the more
tantalizing—genius depends upon the Earth.
No comments:
Post a Comment